Why the study?
Does a 6-parameter clinical scoring system predict the efficacy of steroid therapy in patients with active myocarditis?
Does a 6-parameter clinical scoring system predict the efficacy of steroid therapy in patients with active myocarditis?
A novel 6-parameter clinical scoring system may help differentiate patients with active myocarditis who will spontaneously improve from those who may benefit from steroid therapy.
Supports score-guided steroid selection in myocarditis; leaves open need for randomized validation before practice change.
The efficacy of steroid therapy for active myocarditis is controversial, so a new scoring system was constructed based on 6 clinical parameters: (1) the mode of onset of the disease; (2) complications of immune-related systemic disorders; (3) evidence of viral infection; (4) the population of infiltrating inflammatory cells; (5) the appearance of multinucleated giant cells in endomyocardial biopsy specimens; and (6) the duration of active myocarditis. Points from -2 to +2 were assigned to each parameter and the total score was calculated from the 6 parameters. Twenty-one patients with clinically suspected myocarditis, who had been admitted to hospital from 1987, were retrospectively analyzed by this scoring system. Sixteen patients were treated without corticosteroids at presentation, and 5 patients were treated by conventional methods with adjunctive use of corticosteroids. In 10 patients of the non-steroid group myocarditis improved and their mean score was -4.8 at presentation. In 6 patients of the non-steroid group, myocarditis and cardiac symptoms persisted after initial therapy, and their score at presentation was -0.8. In 2 patients of the steroid group myocarditis improved after initial therapy and their score was +2. In 2 other patients of the steroid group, myocarditis and cardiac symptoms persisted and their score was +3. Another patient of the steroid group died from congestive heart failure and his score was -5 at presentation. In 8 of 9 patients with persistent myocarditis, the secondary phase therapy was challenged. Seven patients were treated with corticosteroids and 6 patients improved. Their score at the secondary phase was +2.5. Overall, non-steroid conventional treatment was successful in patients with the scores from -5 to -4, and steroid therapy succeeded in patients with scores from 0 to +6. Although this is a retrospective study, this scoring system is able to predict the efficacy of steroid therapy in patients with clinically suspected active myocarditis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kodama et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: