Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The current study compares offending trends of sexually abusive clergy ( n = 1,428) to general sex offenders ( n = 2,842) on risk measure items coded across the course of offending. Results suggest significant differences on most risk-relevant variables. Clergy were particularly more likely to have male victims, V = .62, 95% CI [.58, .65], and less likely to be married, V = .59, 95% CI [.56, .63], or use force, V = .76, 95% CI [.73, .79]. The magnitude of differences remained when matched on offense factors (e.g., male child acquaintance victims). Findings suggest sexually abusive clergy are a unique subgroup differing from general sex offenders on factors associated with recidivism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perillo et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: