This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
We investigated gas adsorption and diffusion in an emerging pillared-bilayer metal–organic framework (MOF), Zn-AIP-AZPY (aip, 5-aminoisophthalic acid; azpy, 4,4′-azobipyridine). This work demonstrated that the crystal structure of this flexible MOF could be controlled by two different activation methods: the thermal activation and the chemical activation. The pore limiting diameter of the thermally activated compound was ∼3.7 Å, whereas that of the fully activated one via methanol extraction was 2.92 Å. Although the aperture size of the fully activated structure was smaller than the kinetic diameter of CO 2 and CH 4, Zn-AIP-AZPY still presented fair adsorption quantity to these two gases. In situ XRD experiments under various gases at different pressures also suggest a minor breathing effect when Zn-AIP-AZPY was exposed to CO 2 and no breathing effect under CH 4 . These results imply the possible ligand rotation occurring during the adsorption of CO 2 and CH 4 in Zn-AIP-AZPY. The Zn-AIP-AZPY membranes were further prepared using the seeded growth method, and these membranes showed an exceptionally high H 2 permeability (over 10 5 barrer) with a good H 2 /CO 2 selectivity (ideal selectivity beyond 8). A reverse CO 2 /CH 4 selectivity, i.e., CH 4 permeates faster than CO 2, was surprisingly found. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted for probing the adsorption properties of CO 2 and CH 4, as well as their adsorption energy landscape in Zn-AIP-AZPY. It was found that this MOF energetically favored the adsorption of CO 2 over CH 4 by nearly 10 kJ/mol. Such a strong adsorption is anticipated to create high energy barriers for CO 2 hopping between neighboring adsorption sites.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kan et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: