Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Differential gene expression analysis may discover a set of genes too large to easily investigate, so a means of ranking genes by biological interest level is desired. p values are frequently abused for this purpose. As an alternative, we propose a method of ranking by confidence bounds on the log fold change, based on the previously developed TREAT test. These confidence bounds provide guaranteed false discovery rate and false coverage-statement rate control. When applied to a breast cancer dataset, the top-ranked genes by Topconfects emphasize markedly different biological processes compared to the top-ranked genes by p value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harrison et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: