Why the study?
Patients with acute pulmonary embolism exhibit wide variability in short-term mortality, making risk stratification vital to determine the need for urgent reperfusion therapies versus conservative strategies.
Risk stratification in acute pulmonary embolism is essential for guiding appropriate management, ranging from urgent reperfusion to outpatient care.
Risk stratification guides acute PE management decisions; Level 4 data leave optimal tools and thresholds open for validation.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pulmonary embolism is the third most frequent type of cardiovascular disease behind coronary artery disease and stroke. Patients with acute pulmonary embolism have significant variability in short-term mortality from less than 0.6% in low-risk patients to 19% in high-risk patients. Risk stratification plays an important role in the management of acute pulmonary embolism as it can determine the need for urgent reperfusion therapies versus conservative strategies. RECENT FINDINGS: The three fundamental steps of risk stratification include the immediate identification of patients that are at high risk for mortality, the identification of patients that are at an increased risk of complications from pulmonary embolism that requires hospital monitoring and potential escalation of therapies, and the identification of patients at a low risk that can be treated as an outpatient. SUMMARY: It is vital to immediately identify high-risk patients for mortality so that they can be evaluated for urgent reperfusion therapies to improve outcomes. Risk stratification for intermediate-risk patients is based on right ventricular dysfunction in patients with hemodynamic stability. RV dysfunction can be assessed by clinical signs and symptoms along with ECHO and cardiac biomarkers. Identifying the low-risk population can help reduce the healthcare burden by allowing for early discharge and outpatient management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chowdhury et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: