Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Equilibrium thermodynamic and kinetic estimations were used to confirm the rather unusual conformation, orientation, and accumulation of dynorphin A-(1-13)-tridecapeptide (dynorphin1-13) on the surface of neutral lipid membranes, as observed by Erne et al. [Erne, D., Sargent, D. F., & Schwyzer, R. (1985) Biochemistry 24, 4261-4263]. I started from the premise that the most stable conformation of molecularly disperse peptides in contact with the hydrophobic phase of a membrane is helical [Henderson, R. (1979) Soc. Gen. Physiol. Ser. 33, 3-15]. Calculation of the Gibbs free energy difference for the transfer of increasing numbers m of N-terminal residues of dynorphin1-13 from their random-coil conformation in water to their alpha-helical conformation in a hydrophobic phase, with the values provided by Von Heijne and Blomberg [Von Heijne, G., & Blomberg, C. (1979) Eur. J. Biochem. 97, 175-181], showed an energy minimum at m = 9 that corresponded to the observed apparent association constant of 9 X 10(4) L/mol. This confirmed our experimental observations. The orientation of dynorphin1-13 in the interphase was estimated by calculation of the molecular amphiphilic moment A. This force vector was defined in analogy to the "helical" and "structural" hydrophobic moments of Eisenberg et al. [Eisenberg, D., Weiss, R. M., & Terwilliger, T. C. (1982) Nature (London) 299, 371-374]. It takes into account the segregation of hydrophobic and hydrophilic residues with respect to the center of the alpha-helix. A peptide located in a hydrophobic-hydrophilic gradient experiences a torque that tends to orient A in a direction perpendicular to the surfaces of equal hydrophobicity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
R. Schwyzer (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: