Why the study?
Musculotendinous injuries represent a major concern in sports medicine, and understanding connective tissue anatomy and grading systems is essential for accurate injury classification and prognosis.
Ultrasound and MRI play a crucial role in diagnosing and monitoring acute musculotendinous injuries, with muscle-specific subclassifications needed to improve prognostic accuracy for return to play.
Ultrasound and MRI review may inform injury assessment; leaves open prospective validation of prognostic utility in athletes.
Musculotendinous injuries represent a major concern in sports medicine, with significant implications for athlete recovery and performance. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging, in particular, play a crucial role in diagnosing and monitoring these injuries, guiding treatment strategies, and estimating prognosis. Understanding the anatomy and distribution of connective tissue is fundamental to identifying and classifying musculotendinous injuries accurately. This review focuses on the imaging features of musculotendinous injuries and their evolution, emphasizing the role of connective tissue and the anatomical differences influencing injury patterns. It also examines current grading systems and their prognostic value, highlighting the need for muscle-specific subclassifications to improve accuracy in predicting return to play.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fusco et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: