Key result
Serum GFAP accurately distinguishes intracerebral hemorrhage from ischemic stroke with an AUC of ~0.86.
Case-Control
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A rapid and reliable diagnostic test to distinguish ischemic from hemorrhagic stroke in patients presenting with stroke-like symptoms is essential to optimize management and triage for thrombolytic therapy. The present study measured serum concentrations of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase (UCH-L1) and glial fibrillary astrocytic protein (GFAP) in acute stroke patients and healthy controls and investigated their relation to stroke severity and patient characteristics. We also assessed the diagnostic performance of these markers for the differentiation of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) from ischemic stroke (IS). Both UCH-L1 and GFAP concentrations were significantly greater in ICH patients than in controls (p < 0.0001). However, exclusively GFAP differed in ICH compared with IS (p < 0.0001). GFAP yielded an AUC of 0.86 for differentiating between ICH and IS within 4.5hrs of symptom onset with a sensitivity of 61% and a specificity of 96% using a cut-off of 0.34ng/ml. Higher GFAP levels were associated with stroke severity and history of prior stroke. Our results demonstrate that blood UCH-L1 and GFAP are increased early after stroke and distinct biomarker-specific release profiles are associated with stroke characteristics and type. We also confirmed the potential of GFAP as a tool for early rule-in of ICH, while UCH-L1 was not clinically useful.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ren et al. (2016) conducted a case-control in Acute stroke (intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic stroke). Serum UCH-L1 and GFAP levels vs. Healthy controls and ischemic stroke vs intracerebral hemorrhage was evaluated on Differentiation of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) from ischemic stroke (IS) (AUC 0.86, p=<0.0001). Serum GFAP differentiated intracerebral hemorrhage from ischemic stroke within 4.5h with an AUC of 0.86 (61% sensitivity, 96% specificity; p<0.0001), whereas UCH-L1 did not.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: