Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the efficacy, safety and impact on viral reservoir of rapid bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) initiation during primary HIV infection (PHI). METHODS: Multicenter, single-arm clinical trial in participants with PHI of <3 months (seroconversion or incomplete serological pattern), starting BIC/FTC/TAF in 6 Spanish centers between January-2021 and September-2022. Primary endpoint was proportion of participants with viral load (VL)<50 copies/mL at 48-weeks on the Intention-to-treat-exposed population (ITTe). Cases were compared with randomly-matched retrospective PHI controls, starting other 3-drug Integrase-Strand-Transfer-inhibitor-based regimens. Reservoir was evaluated in PHI cases by Intact Proviral DNA Assay (IPDA). RESULTS: We included 64 participants, 94% cis-male, aged 32 (26;41) years.; 78% men-who-have-sex-with-men. At BIC/FTC/TAF initiation, Fiebig stages were II (14%), III (11%); IV (5%), V (54%) and VI (16%); VL was 496,520 (110,000;1,285,000) copies/mL; 62% were subtype B; median (IQR) CD4 T cell count was 406 (322;535) cells/µL; 6% had active hepatitis B virus co-infection. All participants started BIC/FTC/TAF at first specialist consultation. 81% (ITTe) and 93% (On-Treatment, OT) had VL<50 copies/mL at 48-weeks. 72% had adverse events, only 3% were grade 3/4; 91% were not-related, none led to BIC/FTC/TAF-discontinuation. 92% of controls (OT) had VL<50 copies/mL at 48-weeks (p=0.914), 11% (17%) modified initial antiretroviral regimen (p>0.001). Intact and defective proviral DNA levels significantly decreased at 48-weeks. CONCLUSIONS: BIC/FTC/TAF showed rapid viral decay, high suppression rates, good tolerability, and reservoir decline in PHI, making it an appealing regimen in this setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ambrosioni et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: