Why the study?
Does alcohol withdrawal cause greater QTc prolongation compared to acute coronary syndrome in emergency department patients?
Does alcohol withdrawal cause greater QTc prolongation compared to acute coronary syndrome in emergency department patients?
Patients presenting to the ED with alcohol withdrawal have a higher prevalence of prolonged QTc intervals compared to those with acute coronary syndrome, highlighting the need for ECG monitoring before administering QTc-prolonging medications.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant ECG monitoring in acute alcohol intoxication; hypothesis-generating for QTc differences versus ACS.
OBJECTIVES: Patients with an alcohol use disorder experiencing acute intoxication or withdrawal may be at risk for electrocardiograph (ECG) abnormalities, including prolongation of repolarization (long QTc [corrected QT]) that may contribute to arrhythmias and may be associated with a threefold increase in the likelihood of sudden cardiac events. Patients with acute coronary syndrome may have prolonged QTc as well. To our knowledge, no previous studies have compared the QTc of ACS with acute ethanol (EtOH) withdrawal syndromes in the emergency department (ED). The purpose of our study was to compare the QTc of those with EtOH withdrawal emergencies with patients with ACS in our ED. Our hypothesis was that the QTc would be similarly prolonged in the two cohorts. METHODS: test for nonparametric data. RESULTS: < 0.01, diff 24, 95% confidence interval 18-29). Electrolytes were not significantly different in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: More patients with EtOH withdrawal-related ED visits had a long QTc than patients presenting with ACS. ED physicians should carefully monitor patients experiencing EtOH withdrawal for cardiac arrhythmias and obtain an ECG. If any medications that prolong the QTc are considered, then an ECG should be obtained before administering medications that may affect the myocardium to make medication safer for the patient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chu et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: