Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 1, 1997Prenatal Diagnosis

Accuracy of cytogenetic findings on Chorionic Villus Sampling (CVS)—diagnostic consequences of CVS Mosaicism and non-Mosaic Discrepancy in Centres contributing to EUCROMIC 1986–1992

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JHJohanne M D HahnemannKennedy CenterLVLars O. VejerslevUniversity of Copenhagen

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Hahnemann et al. (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a754c9a0b1b00a0ee092e6ahttps://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0223(199709)17:9<801::aid-pd153>3.0.co;2-e
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Down syndrome at birth not detected by first‐trimester chorionic villus sampling1989 · 19 citations
  2. 2Cytogenetic analysis of 2928 CVS samples and 1075 amniocenteses from randomized studies1993 · 53 citations
  3. 3The European collaborative study on mosaicism in chorionic villus sampling: Data from 1986 to 19871989 · 111 citations
  4. 4Discordant findings in chorionic villus direct preparation and long term culture—mosaicism in the fetus1990 · 12 citations
  5. 5False negative findings at third trimester chorionic villus sampling (C.V.S.)1988 · 26 citations