Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper introduces and explores the notion of weakly S-2-absorbing ideals within the framework of non-commutative rings. Extending the concepts of weakly 2-absorbing ideals and weakly S-prime ideals, an ideal K of a ring R, which is disjoint from an m-system S, is defined as a (weakly) S-2-absorbing ideal if, for all r1, r2, r3 ∈ R with r1Rr2Rr3 ⊆ K (or 0 ≠ r1Rr2Rr3 ⊆ K), there exists s ∈ S such that r1r2〈s〉 ⊆ K, r1r3〈s〉 ⊆ K, or r2r3〈s〉 ⊆ K. We investigate key properties of weakly S-2-absorbing ideals, highlighting their differences from related structures such as weakly 2-absorbing ideals. Additionally, we analyze weakly S-2-absorbing ideals in various ring constructions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abouhalaka et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: