Vitamin E succinate inhibited proliferation of C4#1 cells, an established avian retrovirus [reticuloendotheliosis virus (REV)]-transformed immature lymphoid tumor cell line, in a dose-dependent manner. The cytostatic effects of vitamin E succinate were reversible in that treated cells regained their ability to divide after vitamin E succinate removal. Possible mechanism(s) for the antiproliferative actions of vitamin E succinate were investigated. Analyses of C4#1 cell surface membrane antigen profiles and morphology indicated that vitamin E succinate was not inducing differentiation of the tumor cells to a more mature, differentiated, nonproliferative state. Five antioxidants, including a synthetic analogue of vitamin E, Trolox, as well as the active vitamin form, DL-alpha-tocopherol, were incapable of inhibiting C4#1 tumor cell growth, indicating that a mechanism of action other than or in addition to functions as an antioxidant may be operating. Cell cycle analyses suggested that C4#1 tumor cells treated with vitamin E succinate were blocked in the G0G1/early S phases of the cell cycle. Tumor growth arrested by vitamin E succinate did not affect the expression of the REV-encoded oncogene, v-rel, at either the RNA or protein level. These studies demonstrated that vitamin E, in the form of vitamin E succinate, inhibited the growth of retrovirus-transformed tumor cells in vitro and suggested that the antiproliferative effects of vitamin E succinate did not involve antioxidant properties but rather, as yet, unidentified mechanisms leading to cell cycle blockage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kline et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: