Why the study?
Few data exist regarding the validation of the Japanese clinical diagnostic criteria for familial hypercholesterolemia.
Do the Japanese clinical diagnostic criteria accurately predict the presence of familial hypercholesterolemia-associated genetic mutations?
Do the Japanese clinical diagnostic criteria accurately predict the presence of familial hypercholesterolemia-associated genetic mutations?
The current Japanese clinical diagnostic criteria for familial hypercholesterolemia are valid predictors of genetic mutations, though an Achilles tendon thickness of 7.0 to <9.0 mm may warrant a tentative diagnosis of potential FH.
Japanese FH criteria perform well in hospital cohorts; leaves open whether lowering ATT threshold improves detection without excess false positives.
Clinical diagnostic criteria of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) in Japan include LDL cholesterol ≥ 180 mg/dL, Achilles tendon thickness ≥ 9.0 mm, and family history. However, few data exist regarding its validation. A series of 680 participants, with a mean LDL cholesterol of 175 mg/dL were enrolled at Kanazawa University Hospital between 2006 and 2018. All had full assessments of, LDL cholesterol, Achilles tendon X-rays, family history records, and genetic analysis of FH-associated genes (LDLR, APOB, and PCSK9). The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis predicting the presence of FH mutations by each clinical marker were assessed. The optimal cutoff values predicting the presence of an FH-associated mutation were 181 mg/dL for LDL cholesterol and ≥7.0 mm for Achilles tendon thickness. AUCs predicting FH mutations were 0.827 for Achilles tendon thickness ≥9.0 mm, 0.889 for LDL cholesterol ≥180 mg/dL, and 0.906 for family history. If Achilles tendon thickness ≥7.0 mm was used as a clinical criterion, then 41 participants (6%) were newly diagnosed with FH and 86 (12%) were newly misclassified as FH. Current clinical diagnostic criteria of FH were validated in this cohort. We recommend considering a tentative diagnosis of “potential FH” if the Achilles tendon thickness is ≥ 7.0 mm and <9.0 mm rather than dismissing a diagnosis of FH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tada et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: