Many conceptions of moral formation--not least some influential modern accounts--are developmental in character: they aspire to trace progress to moral maturity through or across some sequence or other of more or less well defined stages of cognitive, conative and/or affective growth. In so far as accounts of this kind are often less than mutually consistent, however, the logical status and/or evidential basis of such developmental theories remains less than clear. This article argues that such accounts are inherently normative--precisely, more evaluative than descriptive--and proceeds to explore some of the more problematic moral educational implications of this claim.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David Carr (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: