Why the study?
Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles showed promise for heart disease, prompting evaluation of the efficacy of a less-invasive peripheral intravenous injection route in chronic myocardial ischemia.
Does intravenous injection of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles improve vascular density and blood flow in a swine model of chronic myocardial ischemia?
Does intravenous injection of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles improve vascular density and blood flow in a swine model of chronic myocardial ischemia?
Intravenous injection of extracellular vesicles failed to increase vascular density or blood flow in a swine model of chronic myocardial ischemia, despite upregulating some pro-angiogenic pathways.
IV EV EVs failed to increase vessel density or perfusion in swine ischemia; leaves open optimal dosing/route for human translation.
BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) appear to be a very exciting treatment option for heart disease. Here, we used a swine model of chronic myocardial ischemia to evaluate the efficacy of a less-invasive method of injection of EVs via a peripheral intravenous route. METHODS: Sixteen Yorkshire swine underwent placement of an ameroid constrictor on the left circumflex (LCx) artery at age 11 weeks to induce chronic myocardial ischemia. Two weeks later, they were divided into two groups: control (CON; n = 8), and intravenous injection of EVs (EVIV; n = 8). At 18 weeks of age, animals underwent final analysis and euthanasia. The chronically ischemic myocardium (LCx territory) was harvested for analysis. RESULTS: Intravenous injection (IV) of EVs induced several pro-angiogenic markers such as MAPK, JNK but not Akt. Whereas IV injections of EVs decreased VEGFR2 expression and inhibited apoptotic signaling (caspase 3), they increased expression of VEGFR1 that is believed to be anti-angiogenic. Injection of EVs did not result in an increase in vessel density and blood flow when compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Although IV injection of EVs upregulated several pro-angiogenic signaling pathways, it failed to induce changes in vascular density in the chronically ischemic myocardium. Thus, a lack of increase in vascular density at the doses tested failed to elicit a functional response in ischemic myocardium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scrimgeour et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: