Why the study?
Smoking behavior is influenced by demographic, familial, and social factors, prompting an examination of the relationship between smoking habits and family dynamics.
Machine learning models, particularly ensemble learning, can accurately predict smoking behaviors based on socio-demographic and familial variables, highlighting the complex interplay between family dynamics and smoking.
Association of smoking with family dynamics is hypothesis-generating; longitudinal studies needed to assess causality and intervention potential.
Smoking behavior, encompassing both traditional tobacco and electronic cigarette use, is influenced by a range of demographic, familial, and social factors. This study examines the relationship between smoking habits and family dynamics through a cross-sectional survey of 100 participants, using an anonymous questionnaire to collect demographic data, smoking patterns, and familial interactions. Validated instruments, including the Penn State Electronic Cigarette Dependence Index and the Family Relationship Assessment Scale, were employed to assess smoking dependence and family dynamics. The analysis identified key patterns, such as increased smoking frequency among individuals experiencing higher family tension and variations in smoking habits across age and gender groups. Nocturnal smoking was linked to higher cigarette consumption, whereas early-day smokers exhibited a lower desire to quit. Machine learning models were applied to predict and classify smoking behaviors based on socio-demographic and familial variables, with an ensemble learning model achieving the highest accuracy (93.33%), outperforming k-nearest neighbors (90.00%), support vector machines (80.00%), and decision trees (83.33%). These findings underscore the complex interplay between family relationships and smoking behavior, providing insights for public health interventions. Additionally, this study highlights the potential of machine learning in behavioral research, demonstrating its utility in identifying and predicting smoking-related patterns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chwał et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: