This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Numerous studies have addressed the challenges ahead in optical lithography due to electromagnetic effects in photomasks (so-called emf effects), which arise from the complex interaction of the illumination with mask topography whose size now approaches the wavelength. As design critical dimensions shrink, the electromagnetic response of the reticle becomes a complicated function of the incident polarization with serious impact to printed critical dimension (CD) on the wafer. A number of modeling techniques are available to approximately account for emf in the process models employed during optical proximity correction calculations, with small to moderate runtime penalty. Among them are simple mask CD bias, the boundary layer [J. T. Azpiroz et al., Proc. SPIE 5040, 1611 (2003)], the domain decomposition method [K. Adam and A. Neureuther, Proc. SPIE 4562, 1051 (2001)], and techniques based on the geometrical theory of diffraction [G. K. Chua et al., Proc. SPIE 5377, 1267 (2004); A. Khoh et al., J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 21, 959 (2004)]. In this article several of these techniques are benchmarked in terms of accuracy and range of applicability. Results are compared against rigorous electromagnetic simulations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tirapu-Azpiroz et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: