Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Regarding the dichotomy between applied science and pure science, there are two apparently paradoxical facts. First, they are distinguishable. Second, the outcomes of pure sciences (e.g. scientific theories and models) are applicable to producing the outcomes of applied sciences (e.g. technological artefacts) and vice versa. Addressing the functional roles of applied and pure science, i.e. to produce design representation and science representation, respectively, I propose a new characterisation of the dichotomy that explains these two facts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aboutorab Yaghmaie (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: