Why the study?
Does intravenous iodinated contrast media increase the incidence of acute kidney injury in elderly inpatients undergoing CT examination?
Does intravenous iodinated contrast media increase the incidence of acute kidney injury in elderly inpatients undergoing CT examination?
Intravenous iodinated contrast administration is associated with a significantly higher incidence of acute kidney injury in elderly inpatients compared to noncontrast CT, though the absolute rate (9.2%) may be lower than previously thought.
ICM exposure was associated with higher AKI rates in elderly inpatients; leaves open causality and whether contrast avoidance should alter CT protocols.
Background. Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a recognised complication of intravascular administration of iodinated contrast media (ICM). Previous studies suggest a higher incidence in the elderly, but no large study has assessed this to date. We set out to assess changes in creatinine in elderly inpatients following computed tomography (CT) examination and compare those who received intravenous contrast to those who did not. Methods. Using the Radiology Information System in two teaching hospitals, inpatients over the age of seventy who had a CT examination and a baseline creatinine were identified and their follow-up creatinine levels were analysed. Elderly inpatients who underwent a noncontrast CT over the same period were used as controls. Results. 677 elderly inpatients who received ICM were compared with 487 controls. 9.2% of patients who received ICM developed acute kidney injury (AKI) compared to 3.5% of inpatient controls (P < 0.0001). Patients with higher baseline eGFR had a higher incidence of post-CT AKI. Conclusions. The incidence of post-CT AKI is higher in patients who received IV ICM compared to those who did not; the difference may be partly attributable to contrast-induced nephropathy. This suggests that the incidence of CIN in the elderly may not be as high as previously thought.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alsafi et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: