The study identifies C filaments as responsible for the high stiffness of relaxed insect fibrillar flight muscle, acting in parallel with cross-bridges during activation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Preclinical insect data only; leaves open C-filament contributions to sarcomere stiffness in mammalian cardiac muscle.
The mechanical properties of glycerol-extracted fibres from the dorsal longitudinal muscle of Lethocerus have been determined by sinusoidal and transient analysis in the time range 1 ms-1000 s, and from rest length to 10% strain for fibres in relaxing and rigor solutions. The fibres behave reversibly up to strains of about 5%, but reach an elastic limit in the range 5-9% strain, depending upon the rate of strain. Electron micrographs of fibres at different degrees of stretch, and after partial extraction of the contractile proteins, suggest that a connexion between the end of the A filament and the Z line, named a C filament, is responsible for the high stiffness of the relaxed muscle. Estimates are made of the compliance of the A, I and C filaments. The mechanical response of the relaxed muscle, over the entire frequency range studied, is assignable to the C filaments. An analysis of the stiffness of the fibres at different tensions in activating and relaxing solutions, and in fibres relaxed by orthovanadate, shows that the C filaments still exert their mechanical effect in the active muscle. That is, the response of the active muscle consists of the contribution from the cross-bridges plus that of the C filaments, acting mechanically in parallel. This situation is incompatible with earlier explanations of the fully activated mechanical dynamics of fibrillar muscle. Alternative explanations at the cross-bridge level are described in the paper that follows this one.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David C. White (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: