Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: We evaluated prospectively the efficacy, predictability, stability, and safety of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia. METHODS: Three hundred sixty-nine eyes of 257 patients were treated with an Aesculap-Meditec MEL 60 excimer laser. Treated eyes were divided into 3 groups: low myopes (-1.25 to -6.00 D), 226 eyes; medium myopes (-6.10 to -10.00 D), 104 eyes; high myopes (-10.10 to -25.00 D), 39 eyes. Follow-up at 12 months was available for 348 eyes (94%). RESULTS: One year after surgery the number of eyes within +/- 1.00 D of emmetropia was 182 (86.7%) for low myopes, 43 (40.5%) for medium myopes, and 12 (30.8%) for high myopes. Values for +/- 0.50 D were low: 142 (67.6%), medium: 29 (29.3%), and high: 9 (23.1%). Three eyes with low myopia (1.4%) and 5 eyes with medium myopia (5.1%) lost 2 or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity. None of the high myopes lost 2 or more lines. Uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better was achieved in 82 eyes (39%) with low myopia; 20/40 or better was achieved in 183 eyes (87.1%). Five eyes (5.1%) of medium myopes achieved 20/20 or better; 52 eyes (52.5%) with medium myopia achieved 20/40 or better. Zero eyes with high myopia achieved 20/20 or better; 11 eyes (28.8%) achieved 20/40 or better. CONCLUSION: Photorefractive keratectomy proved to be an effective method to correct myopia up to -6.00 D. For myopia greater than -6.00 D, good results were achieved in most eyes when myopia was less than -10.00 D, but efficacy and predictability decrease. To avoid systematic undercorrection, slight overcorrection must be attempted with the Aesculap-Meditec MEL 60 excimer laser for the treatment of myopia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pietilä et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: