Why the study?
What are patients' and practice nurses' perceptions of nurse-led secondary preventive care for established ischaemic heart disease?
What are patients' and practice nurses' perceptions of nurse-led secondary preventive care for established ischaemic heart disease?
Nurse-led secondary prevention clinics for ischaemic heart disease are acceptable to patients and nurses, but highlight a need for further nurse education regarding cardiac medications and disease understanding.
Acceptability supports pilot nurse-led programs in primary care; leaves open whether targeted training improves confidence and outcomes.
• A significant proportion of patients with established ischaemic heart disease remain unrecognized in general practice and those who are receiving treatment are experiencing sub‐optimal care. • The provision of coronary prevention by practice nurses may be an important strategy to improve the quality of this care, and this is feasible and effective. • This study explored what occurred during patients’ initial assessment for secondary prevention of ischaemic heart disease with a practice nurse and investigated patients’ and practice nurses’ views of nurse‐led clinics in primary care. • Nurses were effective in history taking and offering reassurance and dietary advice, yet were less confident in discussing patients’ understandings of heart disease and related medication. • Practice nurse‐led coronary preventive care is acceptable to both nurses and patients. • Further practice nurse education is required in heart disease, cardiac medications and skills necessary for exploring and challenging patients’ understandings of these issues.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wright et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: