Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Study aim This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a structured swimming training program on selected motor abilities in young female swimmers compared to a control group. Material and methods: The study lasted 3 years. The experimental group included 14 swimmers (mean biological age at baseline: 10.52 years), while the control group consisted of 14 girls (mean biological age: 10.74 ± 0.62 years) who only participated in compulsory physical education classes. Every 6 months, both groups were tested for lower limb explosive strength, speed, and coordination, abdominal muscle strength, and anaerobic power (estimated using the vertical jump test). Results After 3 years of training, the swimming group demonstrated significantly better performance in lower limb explosive strength - standing long jump test (KW-H(1,168) = 66.173, p = 0.001), speed and coordination (KW-H(1,168) = 32.806, p < 0.001), reach jump (KW-H(1,168) = 12.433; p = 0.004), the horizontal scissors execution time (KW-H(1,168) = 43.915; p < 0.001). In contrast, the control group showed a higher median muscle power output (MPA); however, this difference was not statistically significant after Bonferroni correction compared with the swimmers. Conclusions A three-year endurance-based swimming training program can significantly improve girls’ motor skills and influence their biological maturation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuberski et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: