Why the study?
Although talent identification in sport is widely considered positive, several controversies exist regarding unequal opportunities, potential violations of equality and children's rights, and questionable methods.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
Questions talent ID equity in youth sport; leaves open need for ethical reforms before wider adoption.
Even though talent identification in sport is considered by many to be a positive phenomenon, there are several controversies associated with the issue. This article deals with these disputations from the liberal position placing the individual at the centre of our focus. Talent identification is viewed as an example of Maxwell’s demon. Based on questionable methods, it provides children with unequal opportunities and builds a barrier preventing their involvement in sport and development. Equality, as defined by Rawls’ theory of justice, and the child’s right to an open future stipulated by Feinberg, may be easily violated by current practice. Further concerns are connected with placing undue emphasis on effort, limitation of resources, pressure on children to specialise at young age and necessity to undergo the whole process of identification, false positive and negative decisions in talent identification and consequential self-fulfilling prophecies. As a result of these issues, seven principles for talent identification in sport from the defined liberal perspective are formulated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vičar et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: