Key result
Personalized antiplatelet therapy aims to balance thrombotic and bleeding risks versus one-size-fits-all strategies.
Why the study?
Despite lack of strong guideline recommendations, clinicians need an evidence base to decide between a one-size-fits-all antiplatelet strategy and personalized therapy guided by platelet function or genetic testing.
Does personalized antiplatelet therapy by genotype and platelet function testing improve the balance of thrombotic risk and bleeding compared to a one-size-fits-all strategy in patients with coronary artery disease treated with stents?
Does personalized antiplatelet therapy by genotype and platelet function testing improve the balance of thrombotic risk and bleeding compared to a one-size-fits-all strategy in patients with coronary artery disease treated with stents?
This review summarizes the evidence for using genotype and platelet function testing to personalize P2Y12 inhibitor therapy in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing stenting.
The platelet P2Y 12 receptor plays a critical role in the genesis of arterial thrombotic events. The demonstration of clopidogrel resistance and the relation of high platelet reactivity to ADP to recurrent ischemic event occurrences in patients with coronary artery disease treated with stents significantly influenced the development of potent P2Y 12 receptor inhibitors. A “one size fits all” strategy of clopidogrel therapy is associated with a greater risk for recurrent thrombotic events compared to uniform use of potent P2Y 12 receptor inhibitors which causes more bleeding. The concept of a therapeutic window for P2Y 12 inhibitor therapy that strikes a balance between the attenuation of thrombotic risk and bleeding has been used to personalize antiplatelet therapy. Despite the absence of a strong recommendation in the current guidelines for platelet function testing or genetic testing, the treating interventionalist must rely on the available evidence base, as summarized in this Review, to help decide whether to employ a one‐size‐fits‐all strategy of antiplatelet therapy or one that is personalized by objective testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gurbel et al. (2026) conducted a review in Coronary artery disease. Personalized antiplatelet therapy by genotype and platelet function testing vs. One-size-fits-all strategy of antiplatelet therapy was evaluated. Personalized antiplatelet therapy using genotype and platelet function testing aims to balance thrombotic and bleeding risks compared to a one-size-fits-all strategy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: