Why the study?
Do CYP4F2, ABCB1, and GGCX polymorphisms influence the dosing and bleeding risk of acenocoumarol in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Do CYP4F2, ABCB1, and GGCX polymorphisms influence the dosing and bleeding risk of acenocoumarol in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
CYP4F2 and ABCB1 polymorphisms influence the dosing requirements and bleeding risk of acenocoumarol in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
May influence acenocoumarol dosing in nonvalvular AF; leaves open validation in larger prospective studies.
BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulants are commonly used to treat patients with thromboembolic pathology. Genetic variations could influence personal response to anticoagulant drugs. Acenocoumarol (AC) is a vitamin K antagonist used in anticoagulant therapy and as a prophylaxis measure in Europe. In this study, we assessed the effect of CYP4F2 rs2108622, ABCB1, and GGCX polymorphisms on the safety profile and regime dosing of AC in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. METHODS: Fifty patients aged 40-70 years were included. All patients received AC in the dose of 1-6 mg daily with a target international normalized ratio of 2.0-3.0. Genotyping for polymorphism markers C3435T for the ABCB1 gene, rs2108622 for the CYP4F2 gene, and rs11676382 for the GGCX gene were designed using polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism. Statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: We found that CYP4F2 rs2108622 CT carriers required a higher AC dose than CC (p=0.0366), and CT and TT carriers required a higher AC dose than CC (p=0.0314). CONCLUSIONS: We found that ABCB1 CT and TT genotypes are associated with a higher risk of bleeding. No influence of ABCB1 and GGCX polymorphisms on the doses of AC was established. CYP4F2 could still be a genetic factor responsible for the personal variability of AC metabolism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sychev et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: