Why the study?
Do ABCB1 polymorphisms affect acenocoumarol stabilization and daily dosing requirements in patients starting treatment?
Cohort (n=115)
Do ABCB1 polymorphisms affect acenocoumarol stabilization and daily dosing requirements in patients starting treatment?
ABCB1 polymorphisms, specifically c.3435TT and c.2677TT, are associated with more rapid stabilization and higher dose requirements of acenocoumarol.
May accelerate stabilization in c.3435TT carriers; leaves open whether genotyping refines acenocoumarol dosing.
BACKGROUND: Acenocoumarol is a vitamin K antagonist used in some European countries. As warfarin, this drug is characterized by a narrow therapeutic index and a large interindividual variability. AIM: The objective of this study was to assess the involvement of ABCB1 polymorphisms on acenocoumarol treatment. MATERIALS & METHODS: An observational cohort study was conducted to assess whether there is an association between the presence of the allelic variants of the ABCB1 gene coding for P-glycoprotein and acenocoumarol stabilization and daily doses during the first 35 days of treatment. RESULTS: One hundred and fifteen patients met the inclusion criteria. The results of the clinical study showed that carriers of ABCB1 c.3435TT were more rapidly stabilized than wild-type patients (HR: 2.97, 95% CI: 1.23-7.18; p = 0.02). The same tendency was observed for the ABCB1 c.2677GT and 2677TT genotypes compared with ABCB1 c.2677GG. The ABCB1 c.2677TT genotype was also associated with a significant increase in doses of acenocoumarol (p = 0.03), the same tendency was observed with the ABCB1 c.3435TT genotype compared with the wild-type patients. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that ABCB1 polymorphisms could be involved in the response to acenocoumarol treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gschwind et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Acenocoumarol treatment (n=115). ABCB1 c.3435TT genotype vs. Wild-type patients was evaluated on Rapid stabilization of acenocoumarol (HR 2.97, 95% CI 1.23-7.18, p=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: