Why the study?
Noise interference can prevent Hjorth descriptor features from accurately representing ECG characteristics when separating AF, CHF, and NSR conditions.
Does a machine learning algorithm using DWT and Hjorth descriptors improve the classification accuracy of AF, CHF, and NSR from ECG signals?
Does a machine learning algorithm using DWT and Hjorth descriptors improve the classification accuracy of AF, CHF, and NSR from ECG signals?
Applying discrete wavelet transform before Hjorth descriptor extraction and optimizing machine learning classifiers achieves up to 95% accuracy in distinguishing AF, CHF, and normal sinus rhythm from ECG signals.
Hjorth descriptors may aid ECG classification of AF and CHF; leaves open prospective clinical validation.
Cardiovascular disorders, including atrial fibrillation (AF) and congestive heart failure (CHF), are the major causes of mortality worldwide. The diagnosis of cardiovascular disorders is heavily reliant on electrocardiogram (ECG) signals. Therefore, extracting significant features from ECG signals is the most challenging aspect to represent each condition of the ECG signals. Earlier studies have claimed that the Hjorth descriptor is assigned as a simple feature extraction algorithm that has the capability of class separation among AF, CHF, and normal sinus rhythm (NSR) conditions. However, owing to noise interference, certain features do not represent the characteristics of the ECG signals. This study addressed this important gap by applying a discrete wavelet transform (DWT) prior to applying the Hjorth descriptor as a feature extraction method. Furthermore, the feature selection process and optimization of various classifier algorithms, including k-nearest neighbor (k-NN), support vector machine (SVM), and artificial neural network (ANN), were investigated to provide the best system performance. This study obtained accuracies of 95 %, 92 %, and 95 % for the k-NN, SVM, and ANN classifiers, respectively. The results demonstrated that the optimization of the classifier algorithm could improve the classification accuracy of AF, CHF, and NSR conditions, compared to earlier studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fuadah et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: