Why the study?
Does MRI-derived valvuloarterial impedance (ZVA-INS) improve the evaluation of LV afterload and correlation with diastolic dysfunction compared to TTE-derived ZVA in patients with aortic valve stenosis?
Does MRI-derived valvuloarterial impedance (ZVA-INS) improve the evaluation of LV afterload and correlation with diastolic dysfunction compared to TTE-derived ZVA in patients with aortic valve stenosis?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A new MRI-based estimate of valvuloarterial impedance (ZVA-INS) correlates more strongly with diastolic dysfunction than traditional echocardiographic estimates in patients with aortic valve stenosis.
Purpose Valvuloarterial impedance (Z VA ), estimating left ventricle (LV) afterload, has been proposed in transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) as a predictor of mortality in aortic valve stenosis (AVS). However, its calculation differs from arterial characteristic impedance (Z C ). Our aim was to apply the concept of Z C calculation to estimate Z VA from MR with carotid tonometry and to evaluate these indices through their associations with symptoms, LV diastolic function and aortic stiffness. Materials and Methods In 40 patients with AVS (76 ± 13 years), Z VA‐TI derived from velocity time integral and E/Ea were estimated by TTE. Z VA‐INS , based on Z C formula, calculated as the instantaneous pressure gradient to peak flow ratio and aortic compliance were estimated by using MRI at 1.5 Tesla. Results Both Z VA estimates were higher in symptomatic than asymptomatic patients (707 ± 22 versus 579 ± 53 dyne.s/cm 5 , P = 0.031 for Z VA‐INS and 4.35 ± 0.16 versus 3.33 ± 0.38 mmHg.m 2 /mL, P = 0.018 for Z VA‐TI ). Although they were both associated with aortic compliance (r = ‐0.45; P = 0.006 for Z VA‐INS and r = ‐0.43; P = 0.008 for Z VA‐TI ) only Z VA‐INS was associated with E/Ea (r = 0.50; P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis to identify determinants of E/Ea, a model including age, mean blood pressure, LV ejection fraction, LV mass, and aortic valve area was performed (R 2 = 0.41; P < 0.01). When Z VA‐INS was added to the model, its overall significance was higher R 2 = 0.56 ( P < 0.01) and Z VA‐INS and LV mass were the only significant determinants. Conclusion Z VA‐INS was more strongly associated with diastolic dysfunction than usual parameters quantifying AVS severity. This new Z VA estimate could improve LV afterload evaluation. Level of Evidence: 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;45:795–803.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soulat et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: