Key result
Combined CHG index and MHR predicts high-risk coronary lesions in NSTE-ACS with ~0.87 AUC.
Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the CHG index alone and combined with MHR or TG/HDL-C for NSTE-ACS.
Does the combination of the CHG index with MHR or TG/HDL-C improve the prediction of high-risk coronary lesions in patients with NSTE-ACS?
Cross-Sectional (n=226)
No
Does the combination of the CHG index with MHR or TG/HDL-C improve the prediction of high-risk coronary lesions in patients with NSTE-ACS?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The combination of the CHG index with MHR or TG/HDL-C provides a high predictive value for identifying high-risk coronary lesions in patients with NSTE-ACS, offering a potential non-invasive tool for risk stratification.
This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, and glucose index (CHG index) alone and combined with the monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (MHR) or triglyceride-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (TG/HDL-C) for NSTE-ACS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (NSTE-ACS) (n=226). CHG index combined with MHR or TG/HDL-C vs. Individual markers (CHG index, MHR, TG/HDL-C) was evaluated on High-risk coronary lesions (Gensini score ≥51) (AUC 0.872, 95% CI 0.815-0.929, p=<0.001). Combining the CHG index with MHR demonstrated a high predictive capacity for identifying high-risk coronary lesions in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome, achieving an AUC of 0.872.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: