Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In vitro hemostatometry and assessment of thrombolysis was carried out in three groups of 72 renal transplant recipients. In one (triple, n = 21) immunosuppression was with cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisolone, while a second group (CsA, n = 29) received cyclosporine and prednisolone alone, and the third group (Aza, n = 22) azathioprine and prednisolone. Results were compared with those in 30 normal controls. A statistically significant increase in hemostasis compared with controls was seen in the triple group and in patients in the CsA group studied within 2 years of transplantation. Hemostasis in the Aza group did not differ from normal. All patients in this group had been transplanted more than 2 years before study. Thrombolysis times were significantly prolonged compared with controls in all three groups. Cyclosporine treatment is associated with enhanced hemostasis and reduced thrombolysis, especially during the first 2 years after renal transplantation. If these in vitro findings reflect events in vivo, this may throw light upon the pathogenesis of the obliterative arteriolopathy that is a feature of cyclosporine nephrotoxicity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baker et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: