Why the study?
The study was conducted to investigate the incidence of short-term atherosclerosis in the common carotid arteries following radiotherapy.
Does radiotherapy increase the shear modulus of the common carotid artery as a biomarker of radiation-induced atherosclerosis?
Does radiotherapy increase the shear modulus of the common carotid artery as a biomarker of radiation-induced atherosclerosis?
Radiotherapy significantly increases the shear modulus of the common carotid artery, suggesting its potential utility as an early ultrasound biomarker for radiation-induced atherosclerosis.
Shear modulus increase may flag early post-RT carotid stiffening; leaves open its value as biomarker pending larger validation.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of short-term atherosclerosis in the common carotid arteries following radiotherapy. METHODS: The mean radiation dose to the arteries was 49.30±15.83 Gy. A computational ultrasound method was introduced to investigate the elastic modulus. Ultrasonography was performed 2-3 cm inferior to the bifurcation region before and after radiotherapy, and sequential images were extracted from a video of each artery. Instantaneous movement of the arterial wall in the radial and longitudinal directions was extracted by implementing the maximum gradient and block matching algorithms, respectively. RESULTS: There was a significant change in systolic blood pressure after radiotherapy (P=0.008). Irradiated arteries had significantly smaller systolic and end-diastolic diameters than non-irradiated arteries (P<0.001). The shear modulus was significantly different between irradiated and non-irradiated arteries (3.10±2.03 kPa vs. 1.38±0.98 kPa, P<0.001). The shear and Young moduli of radiation-induced arteries were 2.25±1.50 and 1.57±0.59 times higher than those of the pre-irradiation arteries. CONCLUSION: The arterial shear modulus can be considered as a new biomarker of radiationinduced atherosclerosis in the common carotid artery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohammadkarim et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: