Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Human memory CD4(+) T cells respond better to inflammatory CCLs/CC chemokines, CCL3 and CCL5, than naive CD4(+) T cells. We analyzed the regulatory mechanism underlying this difference. Memory and naive CD4(+) T cells expressed similarly high levels of CCR1; however, CCR5 was only expressed in memory CD4(+) T cells at low levels. Experiments using mAbs to block chemokine receptors revealed that CCR1 functioned as a major receptor for the binding of CCL5 in memory and naive CD4(+) T cells as well as the ligand-induced chemotaxis in memory CD4(+) T cells. Stimulation of memory CD4(+) T cells with CCL5 activated protein tyrosine kinase-dependent cascades, which were significantly blocked by anti-CCR1 mAb, whereas this stimulation failed to induce these events in naive CD4(+) T cells. Intracellular expressions of regulator of G protein signaling 3 and 4 were only detected in naive CD4(+) T cells. Pretreatment of cell membrane fractions from memory and naive CD4(+) T cells with GTP-gamma S inhibited CCL5 binding, indicating the involvement of G proteins in the interaction of CCL5 and its receptor(s). In contrast, CCL5 enhanced the GTP binding to G(i alpha) and G(q alpha) in memory CD4(+) T cells, but not in naive CD4(+) T cells. Thus, a failure of the ligand-induced activation of CCR1-mediated downstream signaling event as well as a deficiency of CCR5 expression may be involved in the hyporesponsiveness of naive CD4(+) T cells to CCL3 and CCL5.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sato et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: