Why the study?
GLP-1 receptor agonists have shown positive effects on composite cardiovascular endpoints, but their specific impact on cardiac structure and function in heart failure patients needed analysis.
Do GLP-1RAs improve cardiac structure and function in patients with heart failure compared to placebo?
Do GLP-1RAs improve cardiac structure and function in patients with heart failure compared to placebo?
In patients with heart failure, GLP-1RAs improve echocardiographic markers of diastolic function but do not significantly alter systolic function or cardiac structure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
GLP-1RAs may improve diastolic function in HF; extends surrogate imaging data but leaves clinical outcomes open.
Article Effect of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist on Cardiac Structure and Function in Patients with Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Xinyu Zhang 1, and Hongyuan Zhang 2, * 1 Division of Bioscience, University College London, London, UK 2 Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK * Correspondence: hongyuan.zhang-3@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk Received: 23 May 2023 Accepted: 8 August 2023 Abstract: Recent clinical trials have shown that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) yield positive effects on composite cardiovascular endpoints, rendering them potentially promising therapeutic agents for heart failure (HF). This study analysed the effect of GLP-1RAs on cardiac structure and function in HF patients. MethodsA comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science databases, spanning from inception to August 1, 2022, to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing alterations in cardiac structure and function in HF patients receiving GLP-1RAs or placebo. Cardiac structures were assessed through left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and left ventricular mass (LVM). Systolic function was evaluated using left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), stroke volume (SV), and global longitudinal strain (GLS). Diastolic function was assessed via the early to late diastolic filling velocity ratio (E/A ratio) and the early transmitral filling velocity to early diastolic mitral annular velocity ratio (E/e ratio). The I2 statistic was used to test heterogeneity. Pooled relative risks were calculated using random-effects models. Potential publication bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. ResultsA total of 1,417 patients from 16 randomised placebo-controlled trials were enrolled in this meta-analysis. Among all HF patients, GLP-1RAs demonstrated improvement in diastolic function as indicated by E/A (MD = -0.15; 95% CI: -0.21 to -0.09; P < 0.00001; I2 = 43%) and E/e’ (MD = -0.82; 95% CI: -1.53 to -0.11; P = 0.02; I2= 62%). However, GLP-1RAs did not exhibit any improvement in cardiac structure and systolic function parameters for HF patients. ConclusionGLP-1RAs demonstrated potential for improving diastolic function in HF patients, but did not show any impact on systolic function and cardiac structure. Therefore, the application of GLP-1RAs should be based on the specific HF type and accompanying comorbidities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: