Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents an analysis of Chichewa locatives and their theoretical implications. Locative phrases exhibit contradictory properties, distributing with DPs but seeming to have preposition-like heads (ku, pa, and mu). I argue that they are DPs whose head nouns are silent. ku, pa, and mu are Case-markers, projecting KP complements to the null nouns and agreeing with them in gender. Word order shows that each KP loc raises to Spec of its containing DP; I propose that null N is licensed thereby. I analyze gaps within Romance DPs as empty Ns also, licensed by agreeing material in Spec positions. Conditions on noun gaps closely resembling those on DP-level pro, I propose a unitary requirement for null [+interpretable] Φ-features in terms of feature-checking relations (Chomsky 1995). This accounts for null nominal elements of all sizes and categories
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vicki Carstens (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: