Why the study?
Patients on ECMO have high mortality, and endothelial activation may drive organ damage, raising the question of whether endothelial biomarkers can predict outcomes.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Population
23 critically ill patients on veno-arterial ECMO
Comparison
Prognostic evaluation of endothelial biomarkers (thrombomodulin, Ang-1, Ang-2, VEGF)
Design
Prospective monocentric study
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Endothelial biomarkers may aid prognosis in ECMO patients; hypothesis-generating for vascular-targeted therapies in refractory shock.
Background Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is often used in critical patients with severe myocardial failure. However, patients on ECMO often have high mortality rate. Recent studies suggest that endothelial activation with subsequent vascular barrier breakdown is a critical pathogenic mechanism in organ damage and related to the outcome in critical illness. This study aimed to determine whether the endothelial biomarkers could serve as prognostic factors for the outcome of patients on ECMO. Methods This prospective study enrolled total 23 critically ill patients on veno-arterial ECMO in the intensive care units of a tertiary care hospital between March 2014 and February 2015. Serum samples were tested for thrombomodulin, angiopoietin (Ang)-1, Ang-2, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were also collected. Results The overall mortality rate was 56.5%. The combination of Ang-2 at the time of ECMO support (day 0) and VEGF at day 2 had the ability of discriminating mortality (area under receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC], 0.854; 95% confidence interval: 0.645-0.965). Conclusions In this study, we found that the combination of Ang-2 at day 0 and VEGF at day 2 was a modest model for mortality discrimination in this group of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsai et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: