We are grateful to the editors and peer referees who have provided valuable comments on draBs of this update and to Sheila Wallace for her help with the searches. We are also grateful to Dr Karen Boyd for providing information about her trial. We would like to acknowledge the work of all contributors to previous versions of the review, particularly Don Wilson who was responsible for the review from its inception. An earlier version of this review was part of a project to add brief economic commentaries to Cochrane Incontinence's reviews on surgery for urinary incontinence in women (Dean 2017). This project was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), via the Cochrane Review Incentive Scheme 2016.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Freites et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: