Why the study?
Are there differences in treatment discontinuation frequencies among different oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Are there differences in treatment discontinuation frequencies among different oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
There are significant differences in treatment adherence among different oral anticoagulants, with apixaban and edoxaban showing lower discontinuation rates than dabigatran and rivaroxaban.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Discontinuation rates vary widely by agent in AF trials; leaves open whether they predict real-world persistence.
BACKGROUND: The new generation, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants are used in an increasing frequency, partially replacing the vitamin K antagonists in several fields of anticoagulation. Efficacy of the preventive oral anticoagulant regime, however, may be compromised by patient non-compliance. METHODS: The authors analyzed treatment discontinuation frequencies in phase 3 trials of anticoagulant treatment in non-valvular atrial fibrillation in a frequentist random effect metaanalysis and in Bayesian multiple treatment network comparison. RESULTS: Frequency of discontinuations are heterogeneous and highly inconsistent (Chi2 test for heterogeneity p < 0.001, I2 test for inconsistency 95.1%). Discontinuations were the most frequent with dabigatran followed by rivaroxaban, warfarin, edoxaban and apixaban. Rivaroxaban were less frequently discontinued when compared to the two doses of dabigatran. (OR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.71-0.91 versus 150 mg b.i.d., and OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.68-0.87 versus 110 mg b.i.d.). CONCLUSION: Important differences exist among the treatment adherence of different anticoagulant protocols. Discontinuation rates experienced during the clinical trials may predict the real life patient adherence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
András Komócsi (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: