Why the study?
The study was conducted to assess the relationship between LV global myocardial work indicators and traditional hemodynamic and deformation parameters of systolic function in patients with STEMI.
In patients with STEMI, novel echocardiographic indicators of myocardial work (GWI, GWE, GCW) correlate strongly with global longitudinal strain.
Myocardial work indices track traditional systolic parameters in acute STEMI; leaves open incremental value beyond GLS in larger cohorts.
Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Purpose to assess the relationship of indicators of global myocardial work of the left ventricle (LV) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with hemodynamic and deformation parameters that traditionally characterize the systolic function of the heart. Methods 45 people with primary STEMI were included: 13 women and 32 men aged 38 to 66 years (52.3 ± 7.4). Myocardial infarction was confirmed by ECG, biomarkers (troponin I, CPK-MB) and by the results of coronary angiography. Echocardiography has been performed on the 7-9th day of STEMI using a Vivid GE 95 Healthcare ultrasound scanner (USA). EchoPAC software version 202 (GE Healthcare) has been used. The end-diastolic volume index (EDVi, ml / m2), end-systolic volume index (ESVi, ml / m2), LV ejection fraction (EF,%) have been assessed using the Simpson biplane method. The global longitudinal strain (GLS,%) has been determined using the speckle-tracking echocardiography method. The indicators of myocardial work have been automatically calculated: the index of global myocardial work (GWI, mm Hg%), global constructive work (GCW, mm Hg%), and global wasted work (GWW, mm Hg%), global work efficiency (GWE,%). Statistical data processing has been performed using the Statistica 13.0 software package (StatSoft Inc., USA). Results the average values of the determined parameters were the following: LVEF - 49.4 ± 6.7%, EDVi - 62.8 ± 12.7 ml / m2, ESVi - 32 ± 8.9 ml / m2, GLS - (-13, 5) ± 4%, GWI - 1192.4 ± 416.2 mm Hg%, GWE - 88.9 ± 6.5%, GCW - 1362.1 ± 442.5 mm Hg%, GWW - 98.5 (69; 130) mm Hg%. The values of the correlation coefficient GWI were: with EF (r = 0.26; p = 0.19), with EDVi (r = -0.3; p = 0.12), with ESVi (r = -0.35; p = 0.07), with GLS (r = 0.85; p = 0.000002). GWE had the following correlation coefficient values: with EF (r = 0.17; p = 0.39), with EDVi (r = -0.42; p = 0.026), with ESVi (r = -0.4; p = 0.025), with GLS (r = 0.74; p = 0.00001). The correlation coefficient of GCW with EF was 0.24 (p = 0.24), with EDVi - (-0.26) (p = 0.19), with ESVi - (- 0.3) (p = 0.1), with GLS - 0.85 (p = 0.000004). The correlation coefficient of GWW with EF was -0.02 (p = 0.9), with EDVi - 0.26 (p = 0.17), with ESVi - 0.2 (p = 0.3), with GLS - 0.37 (p = 0.06). Conclusion the analysis of the correlations between the indicators of myocardial work and the determined parameters revealed that GWE had a moderate correlation with EDVi, ESVi. Parameters GWI, GWE, GCW had a strong correlation with GLS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Golubeva et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: