Why the study?
Is a minimally invasive hybrid approach feasible and safe for high-risk patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction?
Is a minimally invasive hybrid approach feasible and safe for high-risk patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction?
A hybrid minimally invasive approach for transvenous lead extraction is feasible and safe, allowing for continuous monitoring and prompt treatment of potential vascular injuries.
Hybrid TLE feasible in selected elective cases; leaves open comparative safety versus standard extraction in prospective trials.
INTRODUCTION: Despite the overall safety, transvenous lead extraction (TLE) remains a challenging procedure with inherent risks, where surgery can still be required in elective cases. In this study, we report our experience with a minimally invasive "hybrid" approach, defined as a procedure performed by an electrophysiologist with the support of a cardiac surgeon in the same operative session. METHODS AND RESULTS: We reported 12 cases of planned hybrid lead extraction; minithoracotomy and thoracoscopy were performed on 10 (83%) and 2 (17%) patients, respectively. A total of 25 leads out of 27 (median lead age 19 years) were successfully extracted with laser, mechanical or combined transvenous sheath. In 3 patients, the direct monitoring of vascular and myocardial integrity allowed for prompt treatment of potential vascular injury during the lead extraction maneuvers. Mean in-hospital stay was 4 ± 2 days. There were no major intraoperative complications and no deaths occurred after 30 days' follow-up. CONCLUSION: The hybrid approach, with minithoracotomy or thoracoscopy, is feasible and it might increase the safety in the most challenging TLE procedures: the minimally invasive surgical intervention allows for continuous monitoring of the critical cardiac structures and prompt treatment of potential complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bontempi et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: