What question did this study set out to answer?

To critically review the published literature evaluating the validity, sensitivity, and clinical utility of the SF-36 health survey in cardiac rehabilitation.

August 1, 2003British Journal of Nursing

A review to examine the use of SF-36 in cardiac rehabilitation

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Why the study?

Is the SF-36 a valid and sensitive tool for measuring health-related quality of life in cardiac rehabilitation patients?

Population

Cardiac rehabilitation patients

Design

Review

Authors

KBKimberley BrownViiV Healthcare (Spain)

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

May support SF-36 screening in cardiac rehabilitation; leaves open direct comparisons with disease-specific tools.

Key Points

To critically review the published literature evaluating the validity, sensitivity, and clinical utility of the SF-36 health survey in cardiac rehabilitation.
Searched CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for literature published between 1995 and 2002.
Identified and reviewed studies utilizing the key terms 'cardiac rehabilitation' and 'SF-36' to assess generic health-related quality of life measurement properties.
The SF-36 demonstrated strong validity, sensitivity, and broad applicability for evaluating health-related quality of life in cardiac rehabilitation populations.
Direct comparative evidence between generic tools like the SF-36 and disease-specific quality-of-life instruments remains insufficient.
Routine use of the SF-36 as a clinical screening tool is supported to identify patient concerns and plan targeted rehabilitation interventions.

Structured PICO

Is the SF-36 a valid and sensitive tool for measuring health-related quality of life in cardiac rehabilitation patients?

Population

Cardiac rehabilitation patients

Intervention

Medical Outcome Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36)

Outcome

Validity, sensitivity, and applicability of SF-36 in cardiac rehabilitationpatient reported

The SF-36 is a valid and sensitive generic tool for assessing health-related quality of life in cardiac rehabilitation, though comparison with disease-specific tools is still needed.

Limitations

More research needs to be performed to compare generic measures of HRQL directly with disease-specific measures in cardiac rehabilitation populations

Cite This Study

Kimberley Brown (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a75890a12165deef3dd7dea https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2003.12.15.11422

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

A review to examine the use of SF-36 in cardiac rehabilitation

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Structured PICO

Limitations

Cite This Study

A review to examine the use of SF-36 in cardiac rehabilitation

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Structured PICO

Limitations

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider