Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We investigated the relationship between a mutual fund’s variation in factor exposures and its future performance. Using a dynamic state-space version of the Carhart (1997) four-factor model to capture factor variations, we found that funds with volatile factor exposures underperform funds with stable factor exposures by 147 bps a year. This underperformance is explained neither by volatile factor loadings of a fund’s equity holdings nor by a fund’s forced trading through investor flows. We conclude that fund managers voluntarily attempt to time factors but are unsuccessful at doing so.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ammann et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: