This review summarizes the history, indications, and evidence for implantable loop recorders in cardiac dysrhythmia monitoring.
May support broader loop recorder adoption for dysrhythmia; leaves open prospective outcome trials before practice change.
Incorporation of technological advances in healthcare delivery has played a foundational role in development of modern healthcare. With the use of wireless transmission in conjunction with digitization of electrocardiography, continuous monitoring strategies have redefined our approach to dysrhythmia. These devices show promising results in evolving implantable loop recorder technology. In this review, we summarize the history of remote monitoring, indications for loop recorders, devices available, evidence for specific devices and anticipated studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akella et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: