Why the study?
The Duke Activity Status Index is widely used to assess functional capacity, but no Sri Lankan version had been validated for patients in Sri Lanka.
Is the Sinhala version of the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI-SL) a valid and reliable tool for assessing functional capacity in preoperative patients?
Is the Sinhala version of the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI-SL) a valid and reliable tool for assessing functional capacity in preoperative patients?
The Sinhala version of the DASI is a valid and reliable tool for assessing functional capacity in Sri Lankan patients awaiting non-cardiac surgery.
Supports DASI-SL use for functional assessment in Sri Lanka; leaves open larger confirmatory studies.
Background Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) is a widely used tool to assess functional capacity among patients, but there is no Sri Lankan version validated for patients in Sri Lanka. This study aimed to cross culturally adapt and test validity and reliability of Sinhala version of DASI (DASI-SL). Methods The questionnaire was translated using forward and backward translation methods and cultural adaptation was conducted. It was pretested on ten preoperative patients and further modified. Construct validity and reliability of DASI-SL was assessed by administering the modified final DASI-SL on eighty-one patients who were awaiting non-cardiac surgeries at university surgical wards, National Hospital of Sri Lanka, and Colombo North Teaching Hospital Sri Lanka. Results The Cronbach's α coefficient for the internal consistency of DASI-SL was 0.861. The concurrent validity of DASI-SL was substantiated by positively correlating (p < 0.01, r s = 0.466) with the physical subscale of SF-36. There was a significant difference (p < 0.01) in the total score of DASI-SL between two age groups. Conclusions The Sri Lankan version of the DASI appears to be a valid, reliable and easy to administer tool to assess functional capacity among patients who are awaiting non-cardiac surgeries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ranasinghe et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: