Randomized trial evaluates multi-modal features for rice yield prediction, implying improved accuracy through feature sufficiency.
In intensive heterogeneous smallholder farming systems such as the Vietnam Mekong Delta (VMD), high-precision and timely rice yield estimation is essential for effective agricultural decision-making. While UAV-based remote sensing provides valuable information, the role of temporal observations relative to feature representation remains unclear under heterogeneous field conditions. This study evaluates the ability of multi-modal feature representations to compensate for limited temporal observations. Spectral features, categorical agronomic variables, and deep spatial features were integrated and evaluated under both multi-temporal and single-temporal configurations. Feature contributions were analysed using SHAP values to characterise the temporal distribution and sufficiency of multi-modal representations. Results show that multi-modal feature integration consistently improves predictive performance across temporal settings. At the flowering (FL) stage, single-temporal models achieved high predictive accuracy ( R 2 > 0.80 ) approximately 30 days before harvest. While the highest predictive accuracy was observed at later growth stages, FL-stage models provided the best trade-off between prediction accuracy and operational lead time. SHAP analysis indicates that predictive information is predominantly captured by FL-stage features. Together with the comparable predictive performance observed between the single-temporal and multi-temporal configurations, these results suggest that additional temporal observations provide limited incremental predictive benefit within the evaluated observation window. These findings indicate that feature-rich representations at a critical phenological stage can compensate for reduced temporal aggregation, highlighting feature sufficiency as a crucial factor for data-efficient crop monitoring and enabling reliable early yield estimation in complex production environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: