This article explores how strategic environments influence security assistance outcomes, suggesting implications for governance.
Under what circumstances does security assistance (SA) produce effective outcomes? This article develops a typological theory of SA effectiveness, adapting the Competence–Control (CC) framework to military assistance. It argues that SA outcomes depend on whether providers prioritise recipient competence or control, and whether the strategic environment supports either. This yields three ideal-type outcomes: cooptation, orchestration, and breakdown. First, the article reviews scholarship on SA. Second, it adapts CC theory to SA. Third, it assesses the plausibility of the mechanisms through three illustrative cases, offering a structured basis for evaluating SA as indirect governance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jean-Marie Reure (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: