Why the study?
What are the optimal chemical therapies for treating hypertension in patients with diabetes?
What are the optimal chemical therapies for treating hypertension in patients with diabetes?
ACEIs and ARBs remain the first-line antihypertensive therapies for patients with diabetes, particularly those with proteinuric CKD, while SGLT2 inhibitors offer additional cardiovascular and renal benefits.
INTRODUCTION: Hypertension and diabetes are two of the most important modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular and renal disease. The majority of patients with diabetes also have high blood pressure (BP) and the presence of hypertension in these patients dramatically increases cardiovascular and renal risk. Areas covered: This article will discuss chemical therapies for hypertension in patients with diabetes, based on currently available evidence on the effects of antihypertensive treatment on metabolic profile and renal endpoints that are the factors mostly influencing drug choice. Expert opinion: Several lines of evidence suggest that angiotensin-converting-enzyme-inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin-receptor-blockers (ARBs) and calcium-channel-blockers (CCBs) have beneficial or neutral effects on carbohydrate metabolism, whereas old β-blockers and thiazide diuretics have not. Renal outcome trials clearly suggest that in proteinuric diabetic CKD ACEIs and ARBs reduce the rate of disease progression. Thus, an ACEI or an ARB, if tolerated, should be the first choice in diabetic individuals, followed by CCBs, vasodilating β-blockers and diuretics, depending on the individual patient characteristics. Recent studies suggest that the novel antidiabetic class of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors may offer a small reduction in BP together with important decrease in incidence of cardiovascular and renal events in patients with type 2 diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarafidis et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: