Demonstrates strong content validity in a new spiritual care framework for nursing students, indicating its cultural relevance.
Background Integrating spiritual care into undergraduate nursing curricula remains inconsistent, particularly in Muslim-majority contexts. Existing models are predominantly grounded in Western or secular frameworks and fail to adequately address the theological and cultural dimensions of Islamic spiritual care. A validated, culturally responsive pedagogical framework is therefore needed. Aim To develop and establish the content validity of the IneRISE-IMAN ( Islamic Nurturing Experience through Reflective-Islamic values embedded , Simulated and Engaged Learning for Internalization , Meaningful , Active Communication , and Nurturing ) model for undergraduate nursing education. Methods A two-round electronic Delphi (e-Delphi) study was conducted with 22 purposively selected experts representing nursing education, clinical practice, Islamic chaplaincy, and nursing students. Content validity was assessed using I-CVI, S-CVI/Ave, and S-CVI/UA. Inter-rater agreement was examined using Fleiss’ Kappa. Results Round 1 demonstrated excellent content validity (S-CVI/Ave = 0.94; S-CVI/UA = 79%). Following targeted revision of six sub-elements, full universal agreement was achieved in Round 2 (S-CVI/UA = 1.00), with 100% panel retention across both rounds. Fleiss’ Kappa indicated moderate inter-rater agreement (κ = 0.44), acceptable for an interdisciplinary panel. Conclusion The IneRISE-IMAN model shows strong content validity as a theoretically grounded framework that integrates Islamic philosophical anthropology, constructivist learning theory, and person-centered nursing for Islamic spiritual care education in undergraduate nursing. Future research should explore construct validity, implementation feasibility, and the impact on students’ clinical skills.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dewi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: