Crossover study compares microbial transmission between hand hygiene and glove use, indicating critical hygiene practices.
Healthcare workers’ (HCWs) hands are primary vectors for pathogen transmission. While non-sterile examination gloves (NSG) are intended to protect against contamination, they are often perceived as a substitute for hand disinfection (HD). This crossover simulation study in student nurses compared the microbial kinetics of once-disinfected bare hands versus continued NSG use and explored unintended Staphylococcus aureus transmission between participants. Using a crossover design, twenty-five student nurses performed standardised nursing tasks on manikins under both conditions in randomised order: (i) NSG worn continuously for 45 min without change; (ii) HD with an alcohol-based hand rub immediately before tasks (no gloves). Hand-impression cultures were taken at 0, 5, 15, 25, 35 and 45 min, plate-reading after 24 and 48 h. Counts > 100 CFU were capped at 100. Behaviour was video monitored. Group differences were analysed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction; S. aureus detection (≥ 1 positive timepoint per arm) was compared by McNemar’s exact test. In the HD arm, mean CFU increased from 1.7 ± 3.3 (baseline) to 31.8 ± 30.4 at 5 min and then plateauing around 40–45 CFU for 15–45 min. In the NSG arm, CFU progressively accumulated, reaching 76.7 ± 29.1, 77.1 ± 27.7 and 81.0 ± 27.7 at 25, 35 and 45 min, respectively. From 25 min onwards, NSG counts were significantly higher than HD counts ( p = 0.0007, 0.0012 and 0.0003; Bonferroni-corrected α = 0.0083). S. aureus (all methicillin-susceptible) was detected in at least one timepoint in 21/25 (84%) NSG-arm participants versus 9/25 (36%) HD-arm participants (McNemar p = 0.0005). Notably, one baseline nasal carrier, following an observed incomplete HD event, contaminated two co-workers via a shared manikin within 5 min, demonstrating HCW-to-HCW spread in the HD arm. Once-disinfected hands rapidly return to a stable resident microbiome level, whereas continued NSG use without glove changing leads to progressive microbial accumulation and substantially higher S. aureus carriage. NSG must not replace HD and require a change interval of 15–20 min, followed by HD after removal. HD must be performed correctly immediately before patient contact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Walder et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: